How the “Under-Seven” Rule Shields New Haven’s Youngest Dog Bite Victims.

A New Haven dog bite injury involving a young child is especially frightening, not only because of the physical harm involved but because of the long term impact it can have on a child’s development and sense of safety. Connecticut law recognizes that young children interact with the world differently than adults, which is why it includes a special protection often referred to as the “under seven” rule in dog bite cases.

This rule plays a powerful role in determining liability when a dog bites a child under the age of seven.

1. Connecticut presumes children under seven cannot provoke a dog
   In dog bite cases, owners often defend themselves by claiming the victim provoked the dog. Connecticut law creates a rebuttable presumption that a child under seven is incapable of teasing, tormenting, or abusing a dog in a way that would excuse the owner from liability. This presumption shifts the legal balance strongly in favor of the injured child.
2. The burden shifts to the dog owner
   Because of this presumption, the dog owner carries the burden of proving that the child’s actions were intentional and severe enough to qualify as provocation. This is a much higher hurdle than simply suggesting the child moved suddenly or was playing nearby. Everyday child behavior is not enough to overcome the presumption.
3. Strict liability still applies in most cases
   Connecticut is a strict liability state for dog bites, meaning owners are generally responsible for injuries their dogs cause regardless of prior behavior. The under seven rule strengthens this standard by making it even harder for owners to escape responsibility when the victim is very young.
4. Public and private locations are treated differently
   Whether the bite occurred in a public place like a park or on private property can still matter. However, when a young child is lawfully present, the under seven rule applies in both settings. This is especially important in neighborhoods, playgrounds, and homes where children are frequent visitors.
5. Injury severity and scarring are major considerations
   Dog bites involving young children often result in facial injuries, scarring, and emotional trauma. These factors can significantly affect compensation. The law recognizes that injuries at such a young age may require long term medical care, plastic surgery, or psychological support.
6. Insurance companies still look for ways to push back
   Despite the legal protections in place, insurers may still attempt to argue supervision issues or alternative causes. Understanding the under seven rule helps parents recognize when those arguments are weak or misplaced.

After a New Haven dog bite injury involving a child under seven, the law provides meaningful protections that many parents are not aware of. The under seven rule exists to reflect common sense reality: young children do not have the judgment or intent required to be blamed for a dog’s violent reaction. Knowing how this rule works can make a critical difference in holding the right party accountable and ensuring injured children receive the care and support they need.